Skip Navigation

Journal of Semitic Studies 2003 48(1):71-108; doi:10.1093/jss/48.1.71
© 2003 by University of Manchester
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bayhom-Daou, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

HISHAM B. AL-IAKAM (D. 179/795) AND HIS DOCTRINE OF THE IMAM'S KNOWLEDGE

Tamima Bayhom-Daou

London

This article aims to reconstruct the views of the Imami scholar Hisham b. al-Hakam on the subject of the imam's knowledge, which is relevant to the question of the nature of early Imamism. This is done mainly on the basis of a textual analysis of key passages from a work of his preserved in the later work of al-Hasan al-Nawbakhti. The analysis shows that Hisham's views were incompatible with esotericist conceptions of the imamate and were significantly different from those found in the classical Imami sources where the imams appear as recipients of various forms of divinely imparted knowledge. Hisham conceived of the imams as no more than infallible transmitters of the Prophet's legacy and did not recognize the possibility of divine communication in the post-Prophetic era. His refutation of the messianic doctrine of the imam as a muhaddath and the Jarudi Zaydi doctrine of ilham reflected that position.


+ This article is based on chapter 2 of my Ph.D. thesis The Imami Shi'i conception of the knowledge of the imam and the sources of religious doctrine in the formative period: from Hisham b. al-Hakam to Kulini (London: School of Oriental and African Studies, 1996). Some of the arguments have been revised but the conclusions remain the same. I would like to thank Professors Wilferd Madelung, Patricia Crone and Gerald Hawting for useful suggestions and comments made at various stages.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.