Skip Navigation

Journal of Semitic Studies 2005 50(1):117-136; doi:10.1093/jss/fgi006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Davies, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The University of Manchester 2005. All rights reserved

Articles

Crypto-Minimalism

Philip Davies

University of Sheffield

Two recent books by William Dever attempt to ‘correct’ the ‘abuse of archaeology’ by ‘revisionists’ and to establish that archaeology can illuminate the ‘real’ history of ancient Israel. But while caricaturing the work of ‘revisionists’ Dever in fact largely follows their methods and conclusions without acknowledgement. Where he departs from these, he lapses into a naïve version of ‘biblical archaeology’ — which he also criticizes. His attempt to elevate the merits of archaeology and archaeologists over biblical studies and its practitioners also obliges him to ‘revise’ the less than glorious role that archaeologists have played in the last fifty years by resisting major advances in our understanding of ancient Israelite history.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.