Skip Navigation

Journal of Semitic Studies 2009 54(2):435-458; doi:10.1093/jss/fgp008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Geva-Kleinberger, A.
Right arrow Articles by Lev, E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

©The author. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the University of Manchester. All rights reserved.

Articles

Language Passivity in the Medical Arabic and Judaeo-Arabic Prescriptions of the Cairo Genizah

Aharon Geva-Kleinberger and Efraim Lev

University of Haifa

A new study of the medical fragments at the T-S Genizah collection has revealed 141 practical prescriptions. These are written in most cases in Arabic script (92) and the minority of them in Hebrew letters, i.e. Judaeo-Arabic (47), one text in Hebrew and one in Judaeo-Persian. Most of the prescriptions were written on one page, usually on one side of a sheet of paper (very rarely vellum). The texts in Arabic have a special technical language which uses verbs intensively in the passive voice (hence LP ‘Language Passivity’) instead of the normal ‘pure imperative’. This method of expression raises many questions about the reason for this formulation and about the alternative possibilities which exist in these prescriptions alongside LP. The following article surveys the LP types, makes some orthographical remarks that shed light on LP, singles out other substitutes for LP in the medical prescriptions in comparison with other medical formularies in the Arabic of the Middle Ages. Finally, it tries to show, that from a merely linguistic phenomenon one can draw conclusions regarding other historical aspects, such as hints about the connection ‘physician-patient-pharmacist’ and the way to differentiate between normal theoretical medical texts and the pure practical medical prescriptions.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.