Skip Navigation

Journal of Semitic Studies 2009 54(2):459-474; doi:10.1093/jss/fgp009
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kasher, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

©The author. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the University of Manchester. All rights reserved.

Articles

The Term Ism in Medieval Arabic Grammatical Tradition: A Hyponym of Itself1

Almog Kasher

Bar-Ilan University

The term ism in the Arabic grammatical tradition is a hyponym of itself. In other words, it can refer to the entire class of words belonging to the part of speech ism, or to just a subclass of this part of speech. In the latter sense it always stands in opposition to one of three other subclasses of this part of speech, viz. sifa, masdar and zarf; the subclass defined by the former is more focal than the one referred to by each of the latter. This interpretation resolves a difficulty stemming from cases where ism and one of the three other terms refer to two mutually exclusive classes, although the latter always refers, in the contexts in question, to a subclass of the part of speech ism.


1This article is based mainly on Ch. 2.1 of my Ph.D. dissertation The zarf in Medieval Arabic Grammatical Theory (Hebrew), which was submitted to Bar-Ilan University in November 2006. The dissertation was carried out under the supervision of Dr Shlomit Shraybom-Shivtiel (Bar-Ilan University) and Dr Yishai Peled (Tel Aviv University).


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.